Refine your search:     
Report No.
 - 
Search Results: Records 1-5 displayed on this page of 5
  • 1

Presentation/Publication Type

Initialising ...

Refine

Journal/Book Title

Initialising ...

Meeting title

Initialising ...

First Author

Initialising ...

Keyword

Initialising ...

Language

Initialising ...

Publication Year

Initialising ...

Held year of conference

Initialising ...

Save select records

Journal Articles

Rise-to-power test of the HTTR (High Temperature Engineering Test Reactor)

Fujikawa, Seigo; Okubo, Minoru; Nakazawa, Toshio; Kawasaki, Kozo; Iyoku, Tatsuo

Nihon Genshiryoku Gakkai Wabun Rombunshi, 1(4), p.361 - 372, 2002/12

no abstracts in English

JAEA Reports

Calculation ot thermal deformations in water-cooled monochromator crystals

*; *; Motohashi, Haruhiko

JAERI-Research 94-029, 54 Pages, 1994/11

JAERI-Research-94-029.pdf:1.81MB

no abstracts in English

JAEA Reports

Calculations of thermal deformations in directly water-cooled monochromator crystals

*; *; Motohashi, Haruhiko

JAERI-M 93-021, 20 Pages, 1993/02

JAERI-M-93-021.pdf:0.79MB

no abstracts in English

JAEA Reports

Bowing reactivity analysis of FFTF core

Yamaoka, Mitsuaki; Hayashi, Hideyuki

PNC TN9410 92-368, 75 Pages, 1992/12

PNC-TN9410-92-368.pdf:1.49MB

A passive safety test phase IIB is planned at the FFTF (Fast Flux Test Facility) core to assess the reactivity feedback effect related to passive safety feature of FBRs, especially the effect due to core deformation. For pre-test analyses of the test, a bowing reactivity analysis has been carried out for FFTF core. The bowing reactivity is analyzed based on core displacement data evaluated postulating ULOF (Unprotected Loss of Flow) event at 30% rated flow. In the analysis, fuel reactivity worth distribution is expressed as function on the reference core without deformation and the bowing reactivity is calculated based on the first-order perturbation theory. This report summarizes the relationships between power to flow ratio and the bowing reactivity with clearance between subassembly load pads and that between the core and the core restraint system as parameters. Followings are main results. (1)As the power to flow ratio increases, a positive reactivity is added to the core by the core deformation until clearance between subassembly load pads doses. This is due to the inward displacement of active core caused by mechanical interactions of subassemblies. (2)After the closure of clearance between subassembly load pads, the active core begins to move outwards, and a negative reactivity is added to the core. (3)The deformation behavior of the outermost subassemblies of the core dominates the bowing reactivity since both the magnitude of deformation and the reactivity effect for unit displacement are large compared with those of others. For the analysis, a code for bowing reactivity calculation has been developed. The calculation method and the manual are also presented in this report.

JAEA Reports

Key design parameter study (II) for large scale-up fast breeder reactor; Optimizing analysis of inherent negative reactivity feedback effect (I); Analysis on thermal transformation of core support plate

*; Tanigawa, Shingo*; *; Yamaguchi, Katsuhisa; *; *; *

PNC TN9410 88-141, 159 Pages, 1988/09

PNC-TN9410-88-141.pdf:10.2MB

The structural analyses of the core support plate have been applied to study thermal transfomation behaviors and the differences of the movement by changing analytical model, under anticipated transient without scram (ATWS) conditions of FBR. The analyses have been performed for 1000 MWe class loop type fast breeder reactor using a structural analysis code FINAS. The thermal-hydraulic results, which have been performed to ATWS conditions using a plant system code, were used as the thermal boundary conditions to the calculation. The scope of the analyses included a whole section of reactor vessel and the dead load of core assemblies was also considered. Following results were obtained from these studies. (1)The thermal transformation of a upper core support plate can be evaluated according to the free expansion behavior owing to the temperature change of core support plate itself. (2)The radial restriction due to core subassemblies has much influence on the axial bend of the core support plate. (3)There are some differences to the transformation results between by the whole model and by the one dimensional model during the thermal transient is large. Another analysis will be needed, however, about the reactivity change according to the displacement of the core structure.

5 (Records 1-5 displayed on this page)
  • 1